Welcome to my first blog posting on the Out Front Blog! And, actually my first blog posting ever…. I am an incredibly slow adapter to new technology, but have been reading this blog for a while and I am honored to contribute my two cents into the public domain about important issues in gay and lesbian communications and marketing. If you would like a refund on those two cents after reading, please let me know….
Back to the topic at hand, or on screen if you will. Last month, my colleague Ben Finzel posted a revealing look into the AIDS 2008 conference on August 12 and CDC’s announcement showing that HIV infection rates are rising among gay and bisexual men in the U.S. AP coverage of the announcement reported that “less than 1 percent of the $699 million reported global prevention spending targets men who have sex with men.”
Fast forward two weeks in August, and the New York City health department announced that New York City residents are contracting the virus that causes AIDS at three times the national rate. According to department officials, almost 4,800 New Yorkers were infected with HIV in 2006, which represents 72 in every 100,000 residents, compared to a national rate of 23 per 100,000. Assistant health commissioner Dr. Monica Sweeney told the AP that these figures underscore the continued need to promote HIV testing and prevention. Completely agree that this needs to happen, but how can it happen when funding for non-profits, state health departments, and other community-based health organizations continues to dwindle as economic reality sets in and monetary support shifts to another cause or issue? We often assume that these organizations can carry the entire burden of communicating the preventive and treatment messages. While they are extremely effective at impacting perception and actions in their immediate communities, staff and resources are typically limited and there is only so much each organization can achieve in this important communications and awareness battle. Having worked with state and local health organizations on public health campaigns, I can absolutely testify that funding allocated for any health issue, whether it is HIV, cancer, or obesity, is sadly only a drop in the bucket for what needs to happen.
I’m not the only one who sees the need for increased funding for this cause. On September 3, The New York Times editorial board published its own assessment of the real numbers on H.I.V. in the U.S. and in New York. The editorial recognizes that the city’s department of health “distributes tens of millions of condoms annually, provides a needle-exchange program for intravenous drug users, tries hard to identify new cases and urges the sex partners of infected patients to get tested. But more is clearly needed.”
Clearly, indeed. Where can this funding come from? With our wallets targeted for so many different issues and causes (especially in this election cycle), perhaps the first step in funding solutions needs to come from the private sector. Some of the big pharma companies have stepped forward to partner with governments and non-governmental organizations to develop a series of initiatives to address the HIV/AIDS crisis in the U.S. and abroad. I’m certain other companies are doing the same with this cause, but more, including those outside of the healthcare sector, should consider HIV-related funding a top priority for community and philanthropic initiatives.
Another step? Dedicated national network time devoted to the cause. On Friday, September 5, the three big networks (NBC, ABC, CBS) came together to devote one hour of primetime coverage to a joint initiative to raise awareness on cancer, called “Stand Up to Cancer.” I watched this. Having relatives who continue to pass away from this disease, it was both emotional and informative, encouraging the 10.4 million individuals who watched to contribute any way possible. The one hour of television raised over $100 million dollars. That works out to 10 dollars for everyone who watched. Cancer is an equally important issue and this was a great way to raise awareness, but what bothered me about this effort was the constant branding by each of the networks that devoting an hour of television, without commercials, was “historic.” Should this be the case? Should these networks not devote an hour each month to important causes, like cancer and HIV? Imagine the power of an evening on television dedicated to HIV awareness, with channels like Bravo, LOGO, here!-TV, and all of our LGBT-friendly media outlets expanding and tailoring their own promotion of the event. Imagine the difference that could make.
Imagine is all we can do until we can increase funding to empower the New York City health department and the countless national, regional, and local coalitions dedicated to eradicating HIV from our communities. If this means I need to host a telethon next to my dear friends Katie Couric, Brian Williams, and Charles Gibson, I say bring it. HIV is ready for its close-up.
Recent Comments